Boosting the correspondence between description logics and proposit ional ynamic logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
One of the main themes in the area of Terminological Reasoning has been to identify description logics (DLs) that are both very expressive and decidable. A recent paper by Schild showed that this issue can be profitably addressed by relying on a correspondence between DLs and propositional dynamic logics (PDL). However Schild left open three important problems, related to the translation into PDLs of functional restrictions on roles (both direct and inverse), number restrictions, and assertions on individuals. The work reported in this paper presents a solution to these problems. The results have a twofold significance. From the standpoint of DLs, we derive decidability and complexity results for some of the most expressive logics appeared in the literature, and from the standpoint of PDLs, we derive a general methodology for the representation of several forms of program determinism and for the specification of partial com-
منابع مشابه
A Correspondence Theory for Terminological Logics: Preliminary Report
We show that the terminological logic ACC comprising Boolean operations on concepts and value restrictions is a notational variant of the proposit ional modal logic K ( m ) To demonstrate the u t i l i t y of the correspondence, we give two of its immediate by-products, Namely, we axiomatize ACC and give a simple proof that subsumption in ACC is PSPACE-complete, replacing the original six-page ...
متن کاملBoosting the Correspondence between Description Logics and Propositional Dynamic Logics
One of the main themes in the area of Terminologi cal Reasoning has been to identify description logics DLs that are both very expressive and decidable A recent paper by Schild showed that this issue can be pro tably addressed by relying on a correspondence between DLs and propositional dynamic logics PDL However Schild left open three important problems related to the translation into PDLs of ...
متن کامل(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare
Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...
متن کاملCompeting Logics and Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This paper offers a short commentary on the editorial by Mannion and Exworthy. The paper highlights the positive insights offered by their analysis into the tensions between the competing institutional logics of standardization and customization in healthcare, in part manifested in the conflict between managers and professionals, and endorses the plea of the authors for further research in this...
متن کاملProviders and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From ...
متن کامل